Overall, I agree with many points in the article, but the
Libertarian Party would need to gain much-needed popularity before their calls
would be taken more seriously. It does appear that the article has good
intentions for the nation when it comes to increasing overall wealth, but
downsizing the federal government to only a tenth of its present size may face
great pressures. Much in the article sounds like a great idea, but making such
great changes would require many years, if not decades. Simply firing most
government employees does not seem like a good solution. This raises a question
whether they actually know how much government spending is enough. 10 percent
of current spending is a very small budget for such a large and wealthy
country. I understand we have a great amount of government spending, but
cutting the budget that much does not seem to be reasonable. Such a great claim
that the government spending should be cut to a tenth requires great evidence
to be taken seriously by me. I do understand that federal and state spending
amounting to about a third of the GDP is high, but what ratio of government
spending is ideal for the U.S.? This question raises many debates, but the
article answers that question with very radically. What began as attempting to
discourage the use of the term "government shutdown" ended with
claims that the federal government should nearly disappear from our lives. Can
the article focus on point without going all over the place? There was not
enough evidence presented for me to be just "Drinking the Kool-Aid"
and simply ignoring reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment