It appears the article tries to stress the fact that having
good intentions doesn't mean that the results will be good. Still, there are
many aid programs that do in fact help Africans, but those funding cleptocrats
obviously cause damage. I believe that stopping aid would grossly damage our
foreign policy in the countries that receive that aid because there are many
counts where aid allows the U.S. government to apply pressure on a country. I
do not believe aid to Africa should stop in its entirety, but it should be
reviewed to see if some of it should be reallocated because stripping money
away from those in need isn't the best way out of the position we are in. I
understand that many believe aid hurts Africa in the long term, but the short
and medium term are also very important because people are affected quite
significantly. As an example, the fall of the Soviet Union promised long-term
benefits to the entire region, but at a huge short and medium-term cost. The cataclysmic
economic consequences in the short term with the transition to capitalism have
cost Russia its empire and a population loss with weakened demographics that
have already cost Russia over an estimated twenty million people in lower
population figures because population growth reversed into decline throughout
the 1990's and 2000's with potential future losses that threaten are much
greater. The whole point of my statement is that Russia was not getting the
needed aid during its transition period and that has enormous human losses that
are comparable to the estimated 22 to 28 million people the Soviet Union lost
in World War 2. Many project that the losses will even exceed those the losses
from the war when the country is in peace-time. As a result, I do not believe
we should stop helping Africa because it can lead to enormous human loss and
suffering in the short and medium-term. I do not believe the long-term benefits
always justify the immediate costs because the long-term benefits are simply
linear projections with a great deal of assumptions, but things can always
change unexpectedly because that is human nature. I am not an expert on African
affairs, but if there is any chance there is discussion to do to Africa what happened
to Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union when it never received the
promised aid and economic help then I am against such actions because of the
huge human losses it can create. I understand much of what I stated can be
greatly contested, but I have done my best to remain pragmatic and would
request that much greater research be done before such general statements such
as ending aid to Africa are made because the consequences of such actions are
not always clear. I do love the quote "give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime", but sometimes feeding someone for a day in just as important as teaching them for a lifetime because it's not always possible to teach them how to fish in a day, so both have pros and cons that cannot be ignored.
No comments:
Post a Comment