My question after reading this article isn't about the article at all. Why is spending unlimited in the election? Why do the Koch brothers have the ability to provide funding and sway an election at all? To me, the solution to the Koch Brothers, to the corruption, and to the electoral circus is a price ceiling. I feel the best option to hinder the "buying of politicians" is to take away the funds. I'd like to see the consequences of limiting the amount of money a politician can spend on elections. They do this in France and I believe that it would sold multiple problems at once.
What do you guys think?
No comments:
Post a Comment