I do not think the taxi medallions are particularly good to
taxi drivers by them being compelled to work longer hours, which is not that
much of a voluntary decision they would make otherwise, in my opinion. Forcing
someone to behave differently shows the power of the taxi medallions on people
who often struggle to make ends meet with such relatively low average annual
incomes. There are many differing opinions on the internet about how taxi
medallions either cause great harm or benefit, so this issue is a matter of
opinion for many. In my opinion, taxi medallions cause harm to the economy by
artificially limiting the number of taxis in many cities. Why should taxis be
limited in number when it causes them to become very expensive and hard to
find. Still, the regulations do cause great benefit by showing medallion
numbers that can have the driver easily identified if there is ever a need by a
rider in case there is some violation and the interior of the new taxis often
have a camera mounted over the rear-view mirror for security, a dispatch radio
on the console, and a credit card reader for the passengers to pay. There is
even a fee for vomit cleanup to help protect the driver and there are many
required stickers that would become fees for the drivers if they were not
placed. Meanwhile the price of medallions have outperformed the S&P 500's
stock index by far everywhere medallions exist. If the market was open then the
medallions would lose their exclusivity and value, and many believe that the
taxi industry would die if the right to transport the public was open to
everyone. The taxi industry without
medallions would become subject to free market forces, which can be a good
thing if the medallions created a cartel or monopoly that operates for its own
benefit. Still, it would cause cities to lose control over the public service
that is essential for any city to survive. There are many stakeholders that
would stand to lose, but it would, in my opinion, be very beneficial to the
market and the general public. Many even consider that the taxi medallion was
the best investment that could have been made in the U.S. 30 years ago, so does
this mean that the stakeholders have too much benefit for the taxi medallion
being a sort of cartel?
No comments:
Post a Comment