April 25, 2018 Dinner/Discussion
For our last SWEET meeting, we have a very special guest - Camilla Kennedy. Camilla currently teaches Environmental Economics and Policy at the University of Alaska Anchorage and works as the Economist for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. She received her BA in Economics from UAF and her Masters in Environmental Economics from the London
School of Economics. She is an alumni of Students Who Enjoy Economic Thinking (SWEET) from 2007-2011, however, she considers herself a lifelong student of economic thinking.
It was suggested last week that we discuss the merits of House Bill 199 which mirrors the Stand for Salmon ballot initiative. The bill has drawn the opposition of oil and gas, mining, logging and construction trade groups as well as most Alaska Native corporations for being a de-facto prohibition on new development, such as Pebble Mine, in Alaska. Pebble Mine is a mineral exploration project investigating a very large copper, gold, and molybdenum mineral deposit in the Bristol Bay region of Southwest Alaska. Proponents argue that the mine will create jobs, provide tax revenue to the state of Alaska, and reduce American dependence on foreign sources of raw materials. Opponents argue that the mine would adversely affect the entire Bristol Bay watershed; and that the possible consequences to fish populations, when mining effluents escape planned containments, are simply too great of a risk.
Some questions to consider:
Are the potential environmental impacts real or exaggerated?
Do the benefits of the project exceed the costs in the short run and long run?
If the project is approved, will the development of the minerals in this region continue the "resource curse" in Alaska?
HB 199 (Stand for Salmon Initiative)
Pebble Mine
Other topics we could discuss with Camilla:
Fairbanks North Star Borough being reclassified as a “serious” nonattainment area for fine particulate air pollution.
The Alaska water and sewer challenge. Over 3,300 rural Alaska homes lack running water and a flush toilet. Most of these homes are located in 30 “unserved” villages.
For our last SWEET meeting, we have a very special guest - Camilla Kennedy. Camilla currently teaches Environmental Economics and Policy at the University of Alaska Anchorage and works as the Economist for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. She received her BA in Economics from UAF and her Masters in Environmental Economics from the London
School of Economics. She is an alumni of Students Who Enjoy Economic Thinking (SWEET) from 2007-2011, however, she considers herself a lifelong student of economic thinking.
It was suggested last week that we discuss the merits of House Bill 199 which mirrors the Stand for Salmon ballot initiative. The bill has drawn the opposition of oil and gas, mining, logging and construction trade groups as well as most Alaska Native corporations for being a de-facto prohibition on new development, such as Pebble Mine, in Alaska. Pebble Mine is a mineral exploration project investigating a very large copper, gold, and molybdenum mineral deposit in the Bristol Bay region of Southwest Alaska. Proponents argue that the mine will create jobs, provide tax revenue to the state of Alaska, and reduce American dependence on foreign sources of raw materials. Opponents argue that the mine would adversely affect the entire Bristol Bay watershed; and that the possible consequences to fish populations, when mining effluents escape planned containments, are simply too great of a risk.
Some questions to consider:
Are the potential environmental impacts real or exaggerated?
Do the benefits of the project exceed the costs in the short run and long run?
If the project is approved, will the development of the minerals in this region continue the "resource curse" in Alaska?
HB 199 (Stand for Salmon Initiative)
Pebble Mine
Other topics we could discuss with Camilla:
Fairbanks North Star Borough being reclassified as a “serious” nonattainment area for fine particulate air pollution.
The Alaska water and sewer challenge. Over 3,300 rural Alaska homes lack running water and a flush toilet. Most of these homes are located in 30 “unserved” villages.